Brandon Aiyuk Skips 49ers OTAs Amid Contract Dispute
San Francisco 49ers wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk has opted to skip the team’s organized team activities (OTAs) due to ongoing contract negotiations. This surprising move underscores the tensions between Aiyuk and the 49ers’ front office as they attempt to reach an agreement on a new contract.
Aiyuk, who is in the final year of his rookie contract, has made clear his desire for a deal that reflects his value to the team. In a recent appearance on the “Nightcap” podcast with Shannon Sharpe and Chad Johnson, Aiyuk articulated his position, stating, “I’m trying to get what I deserve. This season, I figured out who I am as a player and what I bring to the organization. If they don’t see the worth in that, then we have a problem.”
The wide receiver’s decision to skip OTAs comes after he unfollowed the 49ers on social media, a common tactic used by players to signal dissatisfaction during contract disputes. Aiyuk is seeking a contract in the range of $25-30 million annually, aligning with the earnings of top-tier wide receivers in the NFL.
Aiyuk had an impressive 2023 season, recording 75 receptions for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns, which earned him a Second-Team All-Pro selection. Despite his contributions and growing leadership role, negotiations have reportedly stalled, with both sides still far apart on terms.
The 49ers, who exercised Aiyuk’s fifth-year option worth $14.1 million for the 2024 season, face financial challenges in accommodating a new deal due to their existing high-value contracts. General Manager John Lynch has expressed hope for a resolution, noting that the team prefers to secure Aiyuk with a long-term deal rather than rely on the franchise tag next offseason.
As the situation develops, the 49ers and Aiyuk remain engaged in talks, aiming to reach an agreement that satisfies both parties before the start of the regular season. This standoff highlights the complexities of managing star player contracts while maintaining a competitive roster under the NFL’s salary cap constraints.
Leave a Reply